Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Blog Assignment # 4

-What was this activity like for you?-

This activity caused me to think about my own approach towards 21st century learning and what steps I am currently taking to elevate my student’s level of consciousness with regards to this 21st century skills and global competiveness.  I find that as educators we are at an advantage in that we are already lifelong learners and that we value progression and innovation.  The question now is how do we model that to our students? As discussed in my group we need to find better ways of motivating, promoting and fostering 21st century skills in our classrooms. I find that this activity was effective in that we collaborated and thought as 21st century teachers.  

-Would it have been easier or harder for your group to “elevate” its own questions? Why?-

The assignment called for collaboration and critiquing; we were to read a group’s questions and elevate them to a higher category on Bloom Taxonomy. We found that as a group we found it harder to elevate our peer’s questions because we tried to find meaning behind them.  I think that our mistake was in trying to answer the questions and then rephrasing it in a way that elicits a higher order response.   

-What did you get out of it?-

This activity actually modeled my Professional Learning Community, PLC in my district.  As a facilitator in my PLC I am often caught asking questions that call for higher order responses.  I think that we are at an age where we need to keep our teachers activity thinking about better ways to improve themselves and their teaching practices.  Given the opportunity, teachers can foster a collaborative environment where we think about the best practices, research and skills to apply to our classrooms.

-What connections do you see between this activity and educational leadership?-

I think that as future school leaders, we need to foster better ways of promoting 21st century skills. Most importantly we need to realize that we need to be active promoters of technology and 21st century skills.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Bloom and the Digital Age


As educators we are all familiar with Benjamin Bloom and his taxonomy on adolescent higher thinking orders.  Bloom uses six levels of learning, which he categorized from simplest to most complex to domains of learning.  On Bloom’s six levels the learner “climbs up the latter” and becomes increasingly aware of his understanding of the subject matter.  Educators and school administrators use Bloom’s Taxonomy in administering better forms of assessments, lesson planning and methodology.  The taxonomy has become an integral part of Education worldwide.

Andrew Church in this 2008 article entitled, Bloom's Taxonomy Blooms Digitally, revolutionized education.   Church revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to better fit the modern world and it's changing student populace.   Educators realize that we are living in a technological age and thus our students are thinking in a technological way.  Church revised Bloom’s original six categories and used nouns instead of verbs to describe the high order thinking skills.   Church demonstrates a complete understanding and appreciation to the digital age and the role education will play in it.

I have personally attended one of Alan November’s workshops on 21st Century Skills.  In his video entitled Myths and Opportunities of Technology in the Classroom; November discusses some of the ways in which we can motivate students in becoming active participants in the 21st Century Classroom.  November’s first thought on the matter is a fact that is becoming very prevalent, that is that schools are not thinking on a global perspective.   The world is changing and technology is allowing the modern world to be innovative and progressive.   Public schools need to mirror this.   As educators, we need to better prepare our students by allowing them to think about the world head.   In an age were most inner city students do not travel outside of their counties, yet alone state, having schools operate on a more global network will allow these students to better excel in the 21st Century.  Furthermore November makes a note to Hitler’s actions towards the Bauhaus Schools in Germany and how they were the center for interdisciplinary education and preeminent flow of ideas in Europe until their downfall.   November mentions that American Schools should operate on this and makes a case in that schools are not allowing students to think critically.  This fits perfectly with Church’s revised taxonomy in that the higher order critical thinking skills are a prerequisite to the digital age.

Professor Zhao, in the video entitled No Child Left Behind and Global Competitiveness, argues that allowing students to take charge of their own education will enable them to be better prepared for the digital age.  Furthermore Zhao argues that lessening state and national requirements is the first step.  Zhao says that American schools are not advancing because we are turning our students into lower level left-brain workers.  We need to allow our students to use higher order thinking skills to better prepare them for the world.  Education should be relevant to the times and should allow students to think in terms of advancement and less on standardization.  Connecting this video to Church’s taxonomy, what is relevant is the information age and the developing of a digital age.  If we shift gears and begin preparing our students for the digital age, we will have new learners using right-brain thinking.